DOJ-OGR-00005263.jpg
528 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
528 KB
Summary
This legal document is a letter dated October 18, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of his client, Ms. Maxwell. Pagliuca argues that due to recent government disclosures and a cumbersome two-step file encryption process implemented by the government, there has been insufficient time to meet the deadline for filing motions *in limine*. Citing a previous court order, he reserves the right for the defense to file additional or supplemental motions after the deadline has passed.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
The recipient of the letter, presumably the judge presiding over the case.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Client |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell', she is the subject of the legal filing, whose counsel is arguing for more time.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Counsel |
The author of the letter, submitting it on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | government agency |
Mentioned as a party with whom concerns were previously raised and as the entity that issued a previous order.
|
| the government | government agency |
The opposing party in the legal case, responsible for disclosures and encrypting files.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-10-11
The government's disclosure of Jencks Act, Giglio material and government exhibits.
2021-10-18
The deadline to prepare and submit additional filings (motions in limine).
Relationships (2)
Pagliuca is identified as Ms. Maxwell's counsel and is submitting the legal document on her behalf.
The document describes a legal case where the government is providing disclosures (as the prosecution) to Maxwell's counsel (the defense).
Key Quotes (2)
"In addition, and as requested by the parties, the parties may bring issues to the Court's attention that arise after the deadline for motions in limine if the issues could not have been raised within the deadline set for in limine motions."Source
— 6/2/2021 Order (Dkt. 297)
(Quoted from a previous court order to support the request to file motions after the deadline.)
DOJ-OGR-00005263.jpg
Quote #1
"This two-step process has slowed the review process."Source
— Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
(From a footnote explaining how the government's encryption method for discovery files has created delays for the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00005263.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document