DOJ-OGR-00005381.jpg
573 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
573 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on October 26, 2021, is a submission by the Government to the Court regarding jury selection procedures for an upcoming trial. The Government argues against providing juror identities to the parties weeks in advance, citing precedent that the purpose of voir dire is to identify disqualifications, not to enable deep background research. The Government requests that peremptory challenges be made at the conclusion of voir dire, not on the trial's start date of November 29, 2021, and asks the Court for clarification on the matter.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kaloyeros | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a cited case, United States v. Kaloyeros, et al.
|
| Percoco | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a cited case, United States v. Percoco, et al.
|
| Parnas | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a cited case, United States v. Parnas.
|
| Barnes | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a cited case, United States v. Barnes.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government | Government agency |
A party in the legal case, submitting arguments to the Court regarding jury selection procedures.
|
| The Court | Judicial body |
The judicial body being addressed in the filing, which has noted the purpose of the jury questionnaire and is being a...
|
Timeline (2 events)
The process of jury selection (voir dire) for the trial. The Government is arguing about the procedures, specifically the timing of receiving juror names and exercising peremptory challenges.
Relationships (1)
The document details the Government's legal arguments against the defense's position on jury selection procedures, specifically regarding the timing of receiving juror information and exercising challenges.
Key Quotes (1)
"the purpose of the voir dire is to ascertain disqualifications, not to afford individual analysis in depth to permit a party to choose a jury that fits into some mold that he believes appropriate for his case."Source
— United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 138 (2d Cir. 1979)
(Cited as legal precedent to support the Government's argument that providing juror identities far in advance for background research is unnecessary.)
DOJ-OGR-00005381.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document