DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
484 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
484 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey before a judge. The discussion centers on whether a complaint's allegations are limited to a period ending in August 2003, which Mr. Pagliuca asserts is inconsistent with testimony. Ms. Comey counters that the complaint is consistent and suggests how to question the witness, Carolyn, on the matter.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on objections ('Sustained') and asking clarifying questions.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing that the allegations in a complaint do not extend beyond August 2003.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court as 'Your Honor' and arguing that the complaint is consistent.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ('Carolyn - cross').
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court hearing regarding the end date of allegations in a complaint, specifically whether they extend past August 2003.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (4)
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney making arguments to the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
Ms. Comey is an attorney addressing the judge as 'Your Honor' in a formal court proceeding.
They are presenting opposing arguments to the court regarding the interpretation of a complaint.
The document header indicates that a cross-examination of 'Carolyn' is underway, a process conducted by an opposing attorney like Mr. Pagliuca.
Key Quotes (3)
"These are the end dates of the allegations, which brackets it before 2004, which is inconsistent with the testimony. And so these are the last two dates alleged in this complaint which does not go farther than August of 2003."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing that the complaint limits the allegations to a period ending in August 2003.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I think the paragraphs themselves are still consistent. I think Mr. Pagliuca can make the point by asking the question of the witness about whether there were any allegations contained after August 2003 in the complaint."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Responding to Mr. Pagliuca's argument and suggesting a way to proceed with questioning the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #2
"Is there a line that says it's the final contact?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking for clarification on whether the complaint explicitly states that the August 2003 incident was the last one.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document