DOJ-OGR-00003141.jpg
694 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
694 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is part of a prosecution's argument against a defendant's request for a bill of particulars. The prosecution contends that the indictment is sufficiently detailed and that the defendant has already received over 2.7 million pages of discovery, making further specifics unnecessary. A footnote reveals that the Government was unable to obtain records of commercial flights taken by the defendant, Epstein, or any victims because the investigation was opened after the records were no longer available.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Torres |
Quoted in a legal citation (quoting Torres, 901 F.2d at 234).
|
|
| Chen |
Mentioned as a party in a legal citation (United States v. Chen, 378 F.3d 151, 163 (2d Cir. 2004))).
|
|
| Wedd |
Mentioned as a party in a legal citation (United States v. Wedd, No. 15 Cr. 616 (KBF), 2016 WL 1055737).
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in footnote 61 regarding the unavailability of commercial flight records for him, the defendant, or any vic...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the prosecuting party, arguing against the defendant's motion. Also mentioned in footnote 61 as not havi...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a legal citation as the court for the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2016).
|
Relationships (1)
Footnote 61 groups 'the defendant, Epstein, or any victims' together when discussing the unavailability of commercial flight records.
Key Quotes (2)
"so general that they do not advise the defendant of the specific acts of which he is accused."Source
— Torres (quoted)
(A quote from a legal precedent (Torres, 901 F.2d at 234) defining when particulars are necessary for an indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00003141.jpg
Quote #1
"the Indictment is a ‘speaking’ Indictment that provides a significant amount of detail as to the Government’s theory of the case and the nature of the proof that will underlie the charges at trial"Source
— United States v. Wedd case
(A quote from a legal precedent (United States v. Wedd) used to argue that the current indictment is sufficiently detailed.)
DOJ-OGR-00003141.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document