DOJ-OGR-00014871.jpg

617 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 617 KB
Summary

This page from a legal document, likely a court opinion, discusses and rejects a defendant's claim of a 'constructive amendment' to their indictment. The court finds that the evidence presented by the Government, including a witness named Jane's testimony, and the jury instructions from the District Court, stayed within the 'core of criminality' of the charged offense. The court also affirms the District Court's handling of an ambiguous jury note, concluding it did not lead to an improper conviction.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jane
Mentioned as providing testimony for the Government.
Mollica Party in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Mollica, 849 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir. 1988)'.
D’Amelio Party in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. D’Amelio, 683 F.3d 412, 417 (2d Cir. 2012)'.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Presented evidence and summation at trial.
District Court government agency
Provided jury instructions and correctly directed the jury regarding an ambiguous note.
Ionia Mgmt. S.A. company
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Ionia Mgmt. S.A., 555 F.3d 303, 310 (2d Cir. 2009)'.

Timeline (1 events)

A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
District Court
Government defendant Jane District Court Jury

Key Quotes (3)

"given notice of the core of criminality to be proven at trial."
Source
— United States v. Ionia Mgmt. S.A. (Quoted to support the principle that flexibility in proof is permitted as long as the defendant has notice of the core crime.)
DOJ-OGR-00014871.jpg
Quote #1
"[t]he core of criminality of an offense involves the essence of a crime, in general terms; the particulars of how a defendant effected the crime falls outside that purview."
Source
— D’Amelio (Quoted to define the 'core of criminality' in the context of a constructive amendment claim.)
DOJ-OGR-00014871.jpg
Quote #2
"accurately instructed that Count Four had to be predicated on finding"
Source
— District Court (A partial quote describing the jury instruction given by the District Court regarding Count Four.)
DOJ-OGR-00014871.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document