DOJ-OGR-00009359.jpg
451 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
451 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. The questioning centers on whether a letter submitted to the court by a Ms. Trzaskoma on July 21st was intended to mislead the court about when certain information was discovered. Brune defends Ms. Trzaskoma's actions and clarifies that their knowledge of the matter began after receiving a letter from a Ms. Conrad, a point they also made in a separate brief to the court.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Mentioned at the top of the transcript as the person under 'direct' examination.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Discussed in the testimony regarding her actions and intent in submitting a letter to the Court.
|
|
| Ms. Conrad |
Mentioned as the sender of a letter that marked the beginning of the witness's knowledge on a certain matter.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw | Company |
A 'Westlaw opinion' was attached to a letter submitted to the court.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that created the transcript, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
| The Court | Government agency |
Mentioned throughout as the recipient of letters and briefs, and the entity allegedly being misled.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A trial that had concluded prior to the events being discussed.
The Court
July 21st
Relationships (2)
Brune is defending Ms. Trzaskoma's actions and intentions regarding a letter submitted to the court, referring to her as part of a collective 'we'.
Brune's side received a letter from Ms. Conrad which was a key piece of information in their legal filings.
Key Quotes (3)
"I don't believe Ms. Trzaskoma was trying to mislead the Court."Source
— Brune (A.)
(The witness's response to the questioner's suggestion that Ms. Trzaskoma was trying to mislead the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00009359.jpg
Quote #1
"In your brief you told this Court and painted a picture like the beginning of your knowledge was the letter from Ms. Conrad."Source
— Questioner (Q.)
(The questioner challenging the witness about the content of a brief they submitted.)
DOJ-OGR-00009359.jpg
Quote #2
"I believe that it's true that our knowledge came after we received the letter. That's what the brief was intended to"Source
— Brune (A.)
(The witness confirming that their knowledge of the matter began after receiving a letter, which was the point of their brief.)
DOJ-OGR-00009359.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document