DOJ-OGR-00014774.jpg
623 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
623 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a legal argument by Mr. Everdell before a judge. Mr. Everdell contends that an 'unreliable message pad' is insufficient evidence to increase sentencing guidelines and argues that the 2003 guidelines should apply because the conspiracy in question ended in 2004. He also challenges a government claim that the defendant received $7 million into 2007, labeling it an 'extreme stretch'.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (inferred) |
Speaking to the Court, arguing about sentencing guidelines, evidence, and financial claims made by the government.
|
| The Court | Judge (inferred) |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions to Mr. Everdell.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2004-12
The document mentions an argument that a conspiracy ended in November or December of 2004, which would necessitate the application of the 2003 sentencing guidelines.
2022-08-22
A legal argument took place regarding sentencing factors, the reliability of evidence, and the applicable sentencing guidelines.
Courtroom
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal court proceeding where Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and presents legal arguments.
Key Quotes (3)
"And this one uncorroborated, unadmitted, unreliable message pad is not sufficient for that purpose."Source
— Mr. Everdell (inferred)
(Arguing that a piece of evidence is not reliable enough to be used as a sentencing factor to increase the guidelines.)
DOJ-OGR-00014774.jpg
Quote #1
"Therefore, the 2003 guidelines must apply."Source
— Mr. Everdell (inferred)
(Concluding the argument that because the conspiracy ended in late 2004, the sentencing guidelines from 2003 are the correct ones to use.)
DOJ-OGR-00014774.jpg
Quote #2
"I believe they pointed to $7 million. I think that is an extreme stretch,"Source
— Mr. Everdell
(Contesting a government argument that the defendant received $7 million into the 2007 time period.)
DOJ-OGR-00014774.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document