DOJ-OGR-00001594.jpg
723 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
723 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the legal standards for pre-trial detention concerning the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It details the government's dual burden to prove she is a flight risk and that no conditions can ensure her appearance in court. The document also discusses the Bail Reform Act's rebuttable presumption against release and how the defense can counter it, noting that unlike in the Epstein case, the government is not arguing that Ms. Maxwell is a danger to the community.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sabhnani |
Cited in the case Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75, regarding the government's burden to show a defendant is an actual risk o...
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of the "Epstein case," which is contrasted with the current case involving Ms. Maxwell.
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the current case. The document states the government does not contend she poses a danger to the comm...
|
| English |
Cited in the case United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319, regarding the defendant's burden to rebut the presumpt...
|
|
| Conway |
Cited in the case United States v. Conway, regarding the satisfaction of the rebuttable presumption.
|
|
| Dominguez |
Cited in the case United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707, regarding evidence that can affect the presumption a...
|
|
| Mattis |
Cited in the case United States v. Mattis, No. 20-1713.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Government | government agency |
Referred to as "the government," it is the prosecuting party that bears the burden in seeking pre-trial detention.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Discussion of the legal standards and burdens for pre-trial detention in the case against Ms. Maxwell.
government
Ms. Maxwell
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the citation for United States v. Conway, referring to the Northern District of California.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the citation for United States v. English, referring to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the citation for United States v. Dominguez, referring to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
|
Relationships (1)
The document describes the government's legal burden in seeking to detain the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, before trial.
Key Quotes (4)
"by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant . . . presents an actual risk of flight."Source
— Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75
(Describing the first part of the government's dual burden in seeking pre-trial detention.)
DOJ-OGR-00001594.jpg
Quote #1
"demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions could be imposed on the defendant that would reasonably assure his presence in court."Source
— Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75
(Describing the second part of the government's burden if it proves the defendant is a flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00001594.jpg
Quote #2
"defendant bears a limited burden of production—not a burden of persuasion—to rebut that presumption by coming forward with evidence that [she] does not pose . . . a risk of flight."Source
— United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319
(Explaining the defendant's role when the Bail Reform Act's rebuttable presumption against release applies.)
DOJ-OGR-00001594.jpg
Quote #3
"[a]ny evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a category listed in § 3142(g) can affect the operation” of the presumption."Source
— United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707
(Describing how the rebuttable presumption against release can be satisfied.)
DOJ-OGR-00001594.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document