DOJ-OGR-00001645.jpg
757 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
757 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated July 27, 2020, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing argues in favor of Maxwell's proposed protective order, which would allow her defense team to publicly reference alleged victims or witnesses who have already spoken on the public record regarding Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein. It contrasts this with the government's more restrictive proposal, arguing the government's position is 'broader than necessary' and would hinder the defense's ability to prepare for trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
Recipient of the letter/filing.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as Ms. Maxwell. The subject of the criminal case and the proposed protective order.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Individual related to the case |
Referred to as Mr. Epstein. His previous criminal prosecution is cited as a precedent for a protective order.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| S.D.N.Y. | government agency |
The court where the case United States v. Epstein was heard (Southern District of New York).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-25
A protective order was approved in the government's criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein.
S.D.N.Y.
Mr. Epstein
United States government
2020-07-27
Document 29 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the citation for the United States v. Epstein case.
|
Relationships (1)
The document discusses litigation relating to both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and mentions civil suits against them.
Key Quotes (2)
"who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation—criminal or otherwise—relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."Source
— Ms. Maxwell's proposed protective order (quoted in the document)
(This is the language from Ms. Maxwell's proposed protective order that defines which individuals the defense counsel is not prohibited from publicly referencing.)
DOJ-OGR-00001645.jpg
Quote #1
"broader than necessary"Source
— The author of the document (Ms. Maxwell's defense counsel)
(Describing the government's proposed restriction on the defense's ability to reference individuals who have already self-identified.)
DOJ-OGR-00001645.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document