DOJ-OGR-00005843.jpg

696 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 696 KB
Summary

This legal document is a filing by the Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. The Government argues that the defense is mistaken in its belief that the Court ordered the specific itemization and isolation of co-conspirator statements from other evidence. The filing asserts that the Court's orders only required the 'disclosure' of these statements and that compelling the Government to segregate them would be unsupported by precedent in the Second Circuit.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ferguson
Mentioned as a party in the cited case 'United States v. Ferguson, 676 F.3d 260, 273 n.8 (2d Cir. 2011)'.
Geaney
Mentioned as a party in the cited case 'United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116, 1120 (2d Cir. 1969)'.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the legal case, arguing against the defense's interpretation of a court order.
The Court judicial body
The judicial body presiding over the case, which issued orders regarding the disclosure of evidence.
Second Circuit judicial body
Refers to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, whose legal precedent is cited.

Timeline (4 events)

2021-10-29
Document 397 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
The Court set a disclosure schedule for Jencks Act material, adopting the Government's proposal.
The Court ordered the Government to produce the identities of co-conspirators and to 'disclose' all co-conspirator statements.
The Court denied the defense request for relief regarding the isolation of statements in the first round of pretrial motions.
The Court The defense

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context that the defense has cited no case from this judicial district to support its argument.

Relationships (3)

The Government adversarial (legal) The defense
The document outlines a disagreement between the Government and the defense over the interpretation of a court order regarding the disclosure of co-conspirator statements.
The Court judicial oversight The Government
The Court issues orders to the Government regarding the production and disclosure of evidence.
The Court judicial oversight The defense
The Court rules on motions and requests made by the defense, such as denying a request for relief in pretrial motions.

Key Quotes (3)

"Government’s proposal"
Source
— The Government (Describing the proposal adopted by the Court for the disclosure schedule of Jencks Act material.)
DOJ-OGR-00005843.jpg
Quote #1
"disclose"
Source
— The Court (Quoting the Court's order to the Government regarding co-conspirator statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00005843.jpg
Quote #2
"disclose statements"
Source
— The Government (Arguing that a requirement to 'disclose statements' is not a requirement to isolate them.)
DOJ-OGR-00005843.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document