DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
771 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
7
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
771 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court opinion from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 1, 2022. The court analyzes and rejects the Defendant's (Maxwell's) argument that Juror 50 was biased due to dishonest answers on a jury questionnaire. The court distinguishes this case from precedents involving deliberate deception, crediting Juror 50's explanation that his nondisclosure was an 'inadvertent mistake' resulting from personal distractions and 'skimming' the form.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation Gonzales v. Thomas.
|
| Thomas | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation Gonzales v. Thomas.
|
| Buckner | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation Buckner v. Davis.
|
| Davis | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation Buckner v. Davis.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
The subject of the court's analysis regarding potential bias and nondisclosure on a questionnaire.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
The Defendant in the case, who is arguing that Juror 50 was biased. Referred to in 'Maxwell Br.' and 'Maxwell Post-He...
|
| Daugerdas | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Daugerdas, which the Defendant relies on.
|
| Parse | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Parse.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 10th Cir. | government agency |
Referenced in the citation for Gonzales v. Thomas, 99 F.3d 978, 989–90 (10th Cir. 1996).
|
| 5th Cir. | government agency |
Referenced in the citation for Buckner v. Davis, 945 F.3d 906, 914–15 (5th Cir. 2019).
|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the cases United States v. Daugerdas and United States v. Parse.
|
| S.D.N.Y. | government agency |
Referenced in the citation for United States v. Daugerdas, 867 F. Supp. 2d 445, 473 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
|
| 2d Cir. | government agency |
Referenced in the citation for United States v. Parse, 789 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2015).
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Appears in the footer as part of the Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00010353'.
|
Key Quotes (7)
"To hold that no rape victim could ever be an impartial juror in a rape trial would, we think, insult not only all rape victims but also our entire jury system."Source
— 10th Cir. Court
(Quoted from Gonzales v. Thomas to support the principle that a victim of a similar crime is not automatically biased.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #1
"dishonest answers"Source
— The Defendant (Maxwell)
(The Defendant's characterization of Juror 50's responses, used as a basis for arguing implied bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #2
"created a totally fictitious persona in her drive to get on the jury."Source
— S.D.N.Y. Court
(Description of the juror's actions in United States v. Daugerdas, a case contrasted with the current one.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #3
"deliberate lies engineered to create a fictitious, ‘marketable’ juror"Source
— S.D.N.Y. Court
(The court's reasoning in United States v. Daugerdas for granting a new trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #4
"extraordinary relief"Source
— S.D.N.Y. Court
(The type of relief warranted in the Daugerdas case due to the juror's deliberate lies.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #5
"inadvertent mistake"Source
— Juror 50
(Juror 50's explanation for his nondisclosure on the questionnaire, which the Court credited.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #6
"skimming"Source
— Juror 50
(How Juror 50 described his reading of the questionnaire, offered as a reason for missing a personal question.)
DOJ-OGR-00010353.jpg
Quote #7
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document