DOJ-OGR-00021868.jpg

609 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 609 KB
Summary

This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses whether a constructive amendment to an indictment occurred. The court concludes that evidence presented by the Government, including a witness named Jane's testimony, and a subsequent jury note did not constitute a constructive amendment. The document affirms the District Court's jury instructions regarding Count Four of the Indictment, finding they correctly captured the 'core of criminality' and were not in error.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
Mentioned in the context of her testimony presented by the Government.
Mollica Party in a legal case
Cited in the case United States v. Mollica, 849 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir. 1988).
D'Amelio Party in a legal case
Cited in the case United States v. D’Amelio, 683 F.3d 412, 417 (2d Cir. 2012) and D’Amelio, 683 F.3d at 418.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned as the party presenting evidence and providing a summation at trial.
District Court government agency
The court that provided jury instructions and whose decision is being reviewed.
Ionia Mgmt. S.A. company
Cited in the case United States v. Ionia Mgmt. S.A., 555 F.3d 303, 310 (2d Cir. 2009).

Timeline (1 events)

A legal trial where evidence was presented, a summation was given by the Government, and jury instructions were provided by the District Court.
District Court
defendant Government Jane District Court Jury

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a party in several case citations (e.g., United States v. Mollica).

Relationships (2)

Government adversarial defendant
The Government presented evidence against the defendant at trial.
District Court professional Jury
The District Court provided instructions to the jury and responded to a jury note.

Key Quotes (3)

"given notice of the core of criminality to be proven at trial."
Source
— United States v. Ionia Mgmt. S.A. (A quote from a prior case establishing the standard for flexibility in proof, as long as the defendant has notice.)
DOJ-OGR-00021868.jpg
Quote #1
"[t]he core of criminality of an offense involves the essence of a crime, in general terms; the particulars of how a defendant effected the crime falls outside that purview."
Source
— D'Amelio (A quote from a prior case defining the 'core of criminality' to distinguish it from specific details of how a crime was committed.)
DOJ-OGR-00021868.jpg
Quote #2
"accurately instructed that Count Four had to be predicated on finding"
Source
— District Court (A description of the District Court's correct instruction to the jury regarding Count Four.)
DOJ-OGR-00021868.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document