DOJ-OGR-00019259.jpg
834 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
834 KB
Summary
This document is a court order denying the Defendant's request to modify a protective order in a criminal case. The original order, entered on July 30, 2020, restricted the use of discovery materials provided by the Government solely for the defense of the current criminal action. The court's decision upholds this restriction, preventing the Defendant from using the documents for any other purpose.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Calderon | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the footnote in the case name United States v. Calderon.
|
| Kerik | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the footnote in the case name United States v. Kerik.
|
| Morales | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the footnote in the case name United States v. Morales.
|
| Wecht | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the footnote in the case name United States v. Wecht.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the criminal case that produced discovery material.
|
| Teligent, Inc. | company |
Mentioned in a case citation in the footnote (In re Teligent, Inc.).
|
| Second Circuit | judiciary |
Mentioned in the footnote as a court circuit whose standard for modifying protective orders is being discussed.
|
| Fifth Circuit | judiciary |
Mentioned in a case citation in the footnote.
|
| Third Circuit | judiciary |
Mentioned in a case citation in the footnote.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The Government began to produce discovery shortly after the protective order was entered.
Upon receipt of some discovery, the Defendant filed a request to modify the protective order.
Defendant
Relationships (1)
The document describes a criminal case where the Government is the prosecuting party and the Defendant is the accused. They are opposing parties in a legal proceeding concerning a protective order for discovery materials.
Key Quotes (3)
"The parties have met and conferred, resolving nearly all the issues relating to the proposed protective order."Source
— Parties to the case (via a court filing)
(Quoted from Dkt. No. 35, indicating agreement on the need for a protective order.)
DOJ-OGR-00019259.jpg
Quote #1
"[s]hall be used by the Defendant or her Defense Counsel solely for purposes of the defense of this criminal action, and not for any civil proceeding or any purpose other than the defense of this action."Source
— Defendant's Proposed Protective Order
(A provision from the Defendant's proposed order, which was included in the Court's final protective order, restricting the use of discovery materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00019259.jpg
Quote #2
"strong presumption against the modification of a protective order."Source
— In re Teligent, Inc. case law
(Cited in the footnote to describe the legal standard in the civil context for modifying protective orders.)
DOJ-OGR-00019259.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document