DOJ-OGR-00013863.jpg
641 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
641 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, is a judicial ruling on the admissibility of certain testimony. The judge concludes that most information sought by the defense from three attorneys is irrelevant or prejudicial, but makes one exception. The judge will permit Mr. Glassman to be asked if he told the government that he had advised a witness, 'Jane', that testifying against Ms. Maxwell would help her civil claim against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein's estate, as this is relevant to the witness's potential bias.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman |
A person whose testimony is being discussed. The judge will permit him to be asked a specific question regarding what...
|
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness in the case whose testimony could be contradicted by Mr. Glassman's testimony. She has a civil case against...
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of his estate, against which 'Jane' has a civil case.
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
A person against whom 'Jane' has a civil case and is testifying against in the current case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, to whom Mr. Glassman allegedly made a statement.
|
| victims' compensation fund | fund |
A fund to which 'Jane' has a claim, which might be affected by her testimony.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A judge is ruling on the admissibility of testimony from attorneys, permitting one specific question to be asked of Mr. Glassman.
Relationships (3)
The document discusses what Mr. Glassman may have told Jane regarding the legal implications of her testimony, suggesting an advisory or professional relationship (e.g., attorney-client).
Jane is testifying against Ms. Maxwell in one case and has a separate civil case against her.
Key Quotes (1)
"Did you tell the government that you told Jane that cooperating with the government and testifying in this case would help her civil case against Epstein's estate and Ms. Maxwell and/or her claim to the victims' compensation fund?"Source
— The judge (as a permitted question)
(This is the specific question the judge will permit Mr. Glassman to be asked, as it is deemed relevant to potentially contradict Jane's testimony and show her motive.)
DOJ-OGR-00013863.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document