Trove
Sign In Get Started

DOJ-OGR-00005194.jpg

744 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

9
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
6
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 744 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 12, 2021. The author argues against a prior legal ruling, the 'Schneider decision,' by citing several court cases to support a 'categorical reading' of statutes concerning sexual abuse. The text contends that opposing arguments misapply legal definitions from statutes like §3509 and §3283, particularly in non-Chapter 109A offenses.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Esquivel-Quintana Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, 198 L. ED 22 (2017)'.
Sessions Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, 198 L. ED 22 (2017)'.
Crocker Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'Crocker v. Navient Sols L.L.C. (5th Cir. 2019)'.
Montclair Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'Montclair v. Ramsdell 107 US 147, 152 (1883)'.
Ramsdell Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'Montclair v. Ramsdell 107 US 147, 152 (1883)'.
Dodge
Mentioned as not being 'current on categorical holdings'.
Davis Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319'.
Schneider
Associated with the 'Schneider decision' which was based on a specific definition of sexual abuse.
Panner Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Panner 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101192 (E.D. Cal. 2007)'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Navient Sols L.L.C. company
Mentioned as a party in the case citation 'Crocker v. Navient Sols L.L.C.'.
United States government agency
Mentioned as a party in the case citations 'United States v. Davis' and 'United States v. Panner'.

Timeline (6 events)

1883
The case of Montclair v. Ramsdell was decided.
Montclair Ramsdell
View
2007
The case of United States v. Panner was decided in the Eastern District of California.
E.D. Cal.
Panner
View
2017
The case of Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions was decided.
Esquivel-Quintana Sessions
View
2019
The case of Crocker v. Navient Sols L.L.C. was decided by the 5th Circuit.
Crocker
View
2019
The case of United States v. Davis was decided (based on 139 S.Ct. 2319).
Davis
View
2021-10-12
Document 338 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
View

Locations (1)

Location Context
E.D. Cal.
Mentioned in the citation for United States v. Panner, indicating the Eastern District of California.

Relationships (4)

Esquivel-Quintana → Adversarial (legal) → Sessions
Parties in the lawsuit Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions.
Crocker → Adversarial (legal) → Navient Sols L.L.C.
Parties in the lawsuit Crocker v. Navient Sols L.L.C.
United States → Adversarial (legal) → Davis
Parties in the lawsuit United States v. Davis.
United States → Adversarial (legal) → Panner
Parties in the lawsuit United States v. Panner.

Key Quotes (3)

"Courts must give effect to every clause of word if possible"
Source
— Crocker v. Navient Sols L.L.C. (Quoted as a legal principle from a 5th Circuit case.)
DOJ-OGR-00005194.jpg
Quote #1
"... if anything the statutes use of the present tense ... supports a categorical reading."
Source
— United States v. Davis (Quoted from a footnote (N.10) in a Supreme Court case to support an argument about statutory interpretation.)
DOJ-OGR-00005194.jpg
Quote #2
"any offense involving"
Source
— Section 3283 (Quoted from a statute to highlight its use of the present tense.)
DOJ-OGR-00005194.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document