DOJ-OGR-00005515.jpg

759 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 759 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that evidence of Jeffrey Epstein acting alone or without Ms. Maxwell's knowledge should be admissible to counter the government's conspiracy charge. The filing distinguishes Ms. Maxwell's case from several other legal precedents cited by the government, claiming they are inapplicable to the current situation.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Alleged co-conspirator
Mentioned as being in a charged conspiracy with Ms. Maxwell.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant / Alleged co-conspirator
The subject of the legal argument, charged in a conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein.
Dawkins Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Dawkins.
Scarpa Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Scarpa.
Chambers Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Chambers.
Boyce Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation Boyce v. Weber.
Weber Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case citation Boyce v. Weber.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the case against Ms. Maxwell.
2d Cir. court
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, cited in several legal cases.
S.D.N.Y. court
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, cited in a legal case.

Timeline (2 events)

The Indictment charged a conspiracy between Jeffrey Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during a discrete time period.
The document discusses the government's burden of proof at Ms. Maxwell's upcoming trial.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location of the court in the cited case Boyce v. Weber.

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey Epstein professional Ms. Maxwell
The document states that the Indictment charged a conspiracy between them.

Key Quotes (3)

"good"
Source
— Legal document (referencing a legal term) (Describing a type of propensity evidence in cited cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00005515.jpg
Quote #1
"bad"
Source
— Legal document (referencing a legal term) (Describing a type of act by a defendant in cited cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00005515.jpg
Quote #2
"disprove government's theory that the defendants congregated ... to discuss the marijuana business"
Source
— Finding from United States v. Scarpa (Quoted as the reason certain evidence was not admissible in the Scarpa case.)
DOJ-OGR-00005515.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document