DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg

500 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 500 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge, Mr. Everdell, and Mr. Rohrbach of the government. They are collaborating to edit statutory text for a legal document, agreeing to remove language related to foreign commerce and coercion to better fit the evidence of the case. The agreed-upon changes include using ellipses and adding the phrase 'knowingly persuades, induces, or entices'.

People (3)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking questions, and confirming edits to a document.
MR. EVERDELL Attorney
Proposing edits to statutory text within a document, addressing the court as 'your Honor'.
MR. ROHRBACH Attorney
Speaking on behalf of the government, agreeing to proposed edits to the statutory text.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
the government Government agency
Mentioned as the party Mr. Rohrbach represents, which agrees with a proposed text edit.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion was held to finalize the wording of statutory text in a legal document. The parties agreed to remove the phrases 'or foreign' and 'or coerces' and add 'knowingly persuades, induces, or entices'.
Southern District Court (inferred)
The Court Mr. Everdell Mr. Rohrbach

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the name of the court reporting company, indicating the location of the court.

Relationships (3)

Mr. Everdell Professional The Court
Mr. Everdell addresses the court as 'your Honor' and presents proposals for the court's approval.
Mr. Rohrbach Professional The Court
Mr. Rohrbach speaks to the court, representing the government's position on proposed text edits.
Mr. Everdell Professional Mr. Rohrbach
They are attorneys on different sides of a case (Mr. Rohrbach represents 'the government') but are collaborating to finalize the language of a legal document.

Key Quotes (3)

"It would need to be ellipses since this is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government."
Source
— MR. ROHRBACH (Agreeing to the removal of the words 'or foreign' from a line of text on behalf of the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #1
"So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will read, "Travel in interstate... commerce," cutting "or foreign" and replacing with the ellipses."
Source
— THE COURT (Confirming and dictating the agreed-upon edit to the document.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #2
"There is the inclusion of the statutory text "or coerces," and since we don't have any evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it read "knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any individual.""
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Proposing an edit to the text to remove language about coercion and replace it with language that aligns with the case's evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document