DOJ-OGR-00010000.jpg
436 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
436 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Ms. Brune, an officer of the court. She is questioned about her ethical obligations, specifically regarding information she discussed with Theresa Trzaskoma on May 12, 2011, concerning Juror No. 1. The discussion revolved around a note the juror had sent about legal terms and whether that juror was a lawyer Trzaskoma had previously found via a Google search.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | officer of this court |
The individual being questioned (testifying) in a court proceeding.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
A person with whom Ms. Brune had a discussion on May 12 regarding a juror and a note.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of significant information received by Ms. Brune on May 12, 2011.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that produced the document.
|
| company |
Mentioned as the tool used for a search ("Google search") that located a lawyer.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2011-05-12
Ms. Brune had a discussion with Theresa Trzaskoma about a juror's note and identity.
Relationships (1)
The document states they had a discussion on May 12, 2011, about a juror and a note related to the trial, indicating a professional or collegial relationship.
Key Quotes (2)
"I don't agree with your characterization. I had an ethical obligation to bring whatever material that I thought was accurate to the Court and that's what I tried to do throughout the trial."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about her obligation to promptly disclose information suggesting juror misconduct.)
DOJ-OGR-00010000.jpg
Quote #1
"On May 12 I had a discussion with Theresa Trzaskoma in which she described her sort of wondering whether the juror who had sent that note referring to respondeat superior and vicarious liability was the lawyer whom she'd earlier located by a Google search."Source
— Brune
(Describing a conversation she had on May 12, 2011, in response to a question about receiving information related to Juror No. 1.)
DOJ-OGR-00010000.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document