DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg
1.42 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
8
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.42 MB
Summary
This document is a docket summary from a legal case involving defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It details a series of court filings and orders from December 2020 concerning Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and the redaction of related documents. The court applies a three-part test from the Second Circuit case *Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga* to approve proposed redactions from both the defense and the government, ultimately culminating in a December 28, 2020 order denying Maxwell's motion for release on bail.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned throughout the document as the defendant in the case, filing motions for bail and proposing redactions.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge signing orders on 12/18/2020 and 12/23/2020.
|
| Comey, Maurene |
Listed in parentheses in the entry for the MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition by USA, likely related to the attached exh...
|
|
| Christian R. Everdell |
Mentioned as the author of a LETTER to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, and associated with a R...
|
|
| Lugosch | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case name Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, which established a three-part test used by the court.
|
| Amodeo | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case names United States v. Amodeo ("Amodeo II") and United States v. Amodeo ("Amodeo I"), cited as ...
|
| Nixon | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case name Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., cited as legal precedent.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Government agency |
The prosecution, referred to as 'the Government', filing a MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bai...
|
| Second Circuit | Court |
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which articulated the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of ...
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | Company |
A party in the cited case Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| Warner Commc'ns, Inc. | Company |
A party in the cited case Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
Timeline (8 events)
2020-12-08
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a renewed motion for release on bail.
2020-12-18
USA filed a MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Renewed Bail Motion.
2020-12-18
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her reply to the Government's opposition to her renewed application for bail.
2020-12-23
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, adopting her proposed redactions and ordering her to docket the redacted documents.
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
2020-12-23
A letter from Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell was filed.
2020-12-23
A REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support was filed by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding her Renewed Motion for Bail.
2020-12-28
The Court issued an Opinion and Order denying Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York, mentioned in the citation for the case Under Seal v. Under Seal.
|
Relationships (3)
Ghislaine Maxwell is the Defendant, and the USA (the Government) is the prosecution opposing her motions for bail.
Christian R. Everdell filed a letter and a reply memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating he is her legal counsel.
Judge Alison J. Nathan is the presiding judge in Ghislaine Maxwell's case, issuing orders related to her motions.
Key Quotes (3)
"judicial documents;"Source
— Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
(The first part of a three-part test to determine if documents should be redacted or sealed.)
DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg
Quote #1
"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to 'the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'"Source
— Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga (quoting United States v. Amodeo)
(Describing factors that can overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg
Quote #2
"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,"Source
— Second Circuit in United States v. Amodeo
(The court's finding that the submissions from both the Government and the Defendant meet this standard, qualifying them as judicial documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document