DOJ-OGR-00017835.jpg
583 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
583 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and the judge regarding an evidentiary objection. The core of the debate is whether testimony supporting a witness's claims about her difficult home life is admissible after her credibility on that very topic was attacked by Ms. Sternheim's side.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Arguing an evidentiary objection before the judge.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case and questioning Ms. Sternheim about the basis for her objection.
|
| Matt |
Mentioned in the header as "Matt - direct", possibly indicating a direct examination involving someone named Matt.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A legal argument occurred between an attorney (Ms. Sternheim) and the judge (The Court) over an evidentiary objection concerning a witness's testimony about her home life and credibility.
Courtroom
Relationships (1)
The document shows a formal, professional interaction where Ms. Sternheim, an attorney, is making legal arguments to 'THE COURT', the presiding judge, during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"But you contested whether she grew up poor, whether she had a relationship with her mother that wouldn't allow her to -- you put all of those things at issue; made a strong point that every inconsistency is an issue because her credibility is central. Good for the goose, good for the gander."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge explaining to Ms. Sternheim why testimony about the witness's background is relevant after her credibility was attacked.)
DOJ-OGR-00017835.jpg
Quote #1
"What is the nature of your objection? So that this witness -- I mean, either it's a prior consistent statement or it's not. I don't understand -- so under the Rule 801(b)(3), right, that's the evidentiary objection. You attacked her credibility on what she testified about her home life. What is the evidentiary objection? Relevance? 403? Tell me."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge pressing Ms. Sternheim to provide a specific legal basis for her objection to the witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017835.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document