DOJ-OGR-00021130.jpg
621 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
621 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of case 22-1426, argues that the District Court abused its discretion during a post-trial hearing. The filing contends that the court improperly prevented the defense from cross-examining Juror 50, who, it is argued, would have been dismissed from the jury had he truthfully disclosed the nature of his past abuse during jury selection. The document contrasts the severe abuse suffered by Juror 50 with lesser forms of sexual assault reported by other potential jurors who were not dismissed.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned in the context of her 'peripheral involvement in the abuse'.
|
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
A juror whose past abuse is central to the legal argument. The document discusses whether he should have been excused...
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The party in the trial who called an expert to testify about memories and whose defense was allegedly limited by the ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court | government agency |
Accused of abusing its discretion in conducting the Post-Trial Hearing by precluding cross-examination of Juror 50.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A hearing conducted by the District Court where it allegedly abused its discretion by limiting the defense's questioning of Juror 50.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a footnote as a location where other potential jurors reported experiencing harassment.
|
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document