DOJ-OGR-00021567.jpg

528 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 528 KB
Summary

This court transcript excerpt from June 29, 2023, details a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge (The Court) regarding the end date of a criminal conspiracy. Ms. Moe contends that trial evidence proves the conspiracy continued through late 2004 and into 2005, while the Court questions whether this constitutes post-conspiracy conduct, as it extends beyond the 18th birthday of a person named Carolyn, whose minority status was apparently central to the charge.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaker arguing on behalf of the government about the end date of a conspiracy.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker questioning Ms. Moe's argument regarding post-conspiracy evidence.
Carolyn
Mentioned in relation to her 18th birthday, which is a key date for defining the conspiracy.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
government government agency
Referred to as a party in the legal case, likely the prosecution.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (3 events)

2004-11-01
A conspiracy is discussed, with specific reference to events in November and December of 2004.
conspirators
A discussion in court about whether a conspiracy continued through all of 2004 and into 2005.
Carolyn's 18th birthday is mentioned as a significant date that may mark the end of the conspiracy being charged.

Relationships (1)

MS. MOE professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' during a formal legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (2)

"And here the trial evidence was that the conspiracy was ongoing through all of 2004 and into 2005."
Source
— MS. MOE (Arguing that the conspiracy's duration is established by trial evidence, extending beyond the date in the indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00021567.jpg
Quote #1
"It exceeds also the date of Carolyn's 18th birthday. And so it's not just what the indictment charges -- but by a conspiracy that is dependent here on Carolyn being under 18 for its continuation."
Source
— THE COURT (Challenging the government's argument by pointing out that the evidence presented extends beyond a key legal threshold for the conspiracy (Carolyn's age).)
DOJ-OGR-00021567.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document