DOJ-OGR-00014557.jpg

555 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 555 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where the jury is not present. A lawyer, Ms. Moe, makes an application to the court, objecting to the defense counsel's summation, arguing that they referred to facts not in evidence. As a specific example, she states that Ms. Menninger read an email from someone named Kate that the court had previously ruled inadmissible.

People (5)

Name Role Context
PAGLIUCA Mr.
Addressed by the Court, states he has no matters to take up.
Moe Ms.
A lawyer making an application to the Court regarding the defense's summation, arguing they referred to facts not in ...
Menninger Ms.
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as having read an email from Kate into the record which was precluded from evidence. Likely defe...
Kate
Mentioned as the sender of an email that Ms. Menninger read into the record.
Honor Judge
Title used to address the judge presiding over the court proceedings.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between the Court and lawyers (Ms. Moe, Mr. Pagliuca) with the jury not present. Ms. Moe makes an application regarding the defense counsel's summation.
Courtroom
THE COURT MR. PAGLIUCA MS. MOE

Relationships (3)

MS. MOE professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe is a lawyer addressing the judge ('your Honor') and making a formal application during a legal proceeding.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca is a lawyer addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a legal proceeding.
MS. MOE professional (adversarial) Ms. Menninger
Ms. Moe is objecting to an action taken by Ms. Menninger during the trial, indicating they are likely opposing counsel.

Key Quotes (2)

"There were a number of points during defense counsel's summations where they referred to facts which are not in evidence and testified to things which are not in evidence."
Source
— MS. MOE (Explaining the basis for her application to the Court for a curative instruction to the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00014557.jpg
Quote #1
"I believe Ms. Menninger read into the record an email from Kate which the Court expressly precluded and which is not in evidence."
Source
— MS. MOE (Providing a specific example to the Court of the defense counsel referring to facts not in evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00014557.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document