DOJ-OGR-00010036.jpg
416 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
416 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about their knowledge of statements made by a Ms. Trzaskoma during a July 15th conference call. The questioning focuses on the timeline of when Brune read the call transcript in relation to filing a letter on July 21st, implying that Brune may have known Ms. Trzaskoma's statements were incorrect. Brune denies this assertion.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The person being questioned in a direct examination, referred to as 'Ms. Brune' in line 21.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as someone who participated in a July 15th conference call and whose statements are being questioned.
|
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who was directing a response, prompting the witness to read a transcript.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | government agency |
The legal body with which a conference call was held and to whom statements were made.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (3 events)
July 15th
A conference call was held with the Court. Ms. Trzaskoma participated and made statements. The witness, Brune, was not on the call.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, as indicated by 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Trzaskoma informed Brune about the conference call 'immediately after that,' suggesting they are colleagues working on the same matter.
Brune read a transcript to understand what 'Judge Pauley was directing us to do,' indicating a relationship between a judge and a party/attorney in a case.
Key Quotes (3)
"We had to respond, so I read the transcript to make sure that I knew what Judge Pauley was directing us to do."Source
— Brune
(Explaining why they read the transcript of the conference call so quickly.)
DOJ-OGR-00010036.jpg
Quote #1
"At the point at which you saw those emails, Ms. Brune, at the very least you knew that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court in that conference call were not correct?"Source
— Questioner
(Questioning Ms. Brune's knowledge of the veracity of Ms. Trzaskoma's statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00010036.jpg
Quote #2
"I disagree."Source
— Brune
(Responding to the accusation that she knew Ms. Trzaskoma's statements were incorrect.)
DOJ-OGR-00010036.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document