DOJ-OGR-00021702.jpg
629 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
629 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, presents an argument regarding the application of Section 3283 to charges against Maxwell for transporting a minor for illegal sexual activity. Maxwell contends the statute doesn't apply because a completed sex act isn't an element of the charge, but the document counters that trial evidence, including testimony from a victim named Jane, established that her offenses did involve completed sex acts. A footnote adds that Judge Nathan found another charge, Count Six, to be timely based on the retroactive application of a different statute, § 3299.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Landgraf | Party in a cited legal case |
Mentioned as part of a legal test or precedent ('step two of Landgraf').
|
| Weingarten | Party in a cited legal case |
Cited in 'See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 55' for a legal principle.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
The subject of the legal argument, arguing that Section 3283 does not apply to counts against her.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as having testified against Maxwell.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned in a footnote as having made a finding regarding the timeliness of Count Six.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in a footnote as arguing a legal point regarding Count Six.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that 'Jane testified that she was' (implying she was a victim of Maxwell's actions) and that Maxwell's crimes involved 'abusing one or more minor victims'.
The document outlines Maxwell's legal arguments against the charges and mentions the Government's counter-arguments in a footnote.
Key Quotes (3)
"If [a statute] would not [create impermissible retroactive effects], then the court shall apply the statute to antecedent conduct."Source
— Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 55
(Quoted as a legal principle supporting the retroactive application of Section 3283.)
DOJ-OGR-00021702.jpg
Quote #1
"offense involving the sexual or physical abuse . . . of a child."Source
— Statute (Section 3283)
(A legal definition from Section 3283 that Maxwell argues does not apply to her charges.)
DOJ-OGR-00021702.jpg
Quote #2
"like § 3283, § 3299 applies retroactively to offenses for which the previous limitations period has not yet run"Source
— A.196 (court document)
(Cited in a footnote as a conclusion supporting the retroactive application of § 3299.)
DOJ-OGR-00021702.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document