DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
510 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
510 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a potential juror regarding their answers on a juror questionnaire. The individual clarifies that their experience with sexual abuse was not what they considered when answering about being a victim of a crime, stating they no longer identify as a victim and can serve as a fair and impartial juror.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Witness/Juror | Witness / Potential Juror |
The person answering questions, denoted by 'A'. They discuss their past experience with sexual abuse and affirm their...
|
| Unnamed Questioner | Questioner (likely attorney or judge) |
The person asking questions, denoted by 'Q'. They are inquiring about the witness's answers on a questionnaire.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting firm that created the document.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-03-11
A potential juror is questioned about their answers on a questionnaire as part of the jury selection process for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
A potential juror filled out a questionnaire on November 4, leaving question 25A blank.
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal questioning session, likely voir dire, where a legal professional is assessing a potential juror's fitness to serve on a jury.
Key Quotes (2)
"I wasn't thinking of my sexual abuse as being a victim of a crime because I no longer associate being a victim. It's part of my healing process and it's how I dealt with the abuse."Source
— Unnamed Witness/Juror
(Explaining why they did not consider their past sexual abuse when answering a questionnaire about being a victim of a crime like robbery or mugging.)
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
Quote #1
"It would have been no. I was definitely able to set aside everything and be fair and impartial."Source
— Unnamed Witness/Juror
(Providing the accurate answer to question 25A on the questionnaire, which asked if any experience would prevent them from being a fair and impartial juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document