DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
662 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
662 KB
Summary
This legal document from September 16, 2020, outlines recent court proceedings involving a litigant named Maxwell and Judge Nathan. On September 2, 2020, Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion, criticizing it as vague and lacking a "coherent explanation" for why criminal discovery materials were needed for her civil cases. Despite the denial, Maxwell was permitted to share some information under seal, and she subsequently filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Presided over a criminal case and issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion.
|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
Filed a reply, a motion that was denied, and a notice of appeal in connection with her criminal and civil cases.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned for its letter in opposition to Maxwell's motion.
|
Relationships (1)
Judge Nathan issued a ruling on a motion filed by Maxwell.
Key Quotes (5)
"fourteen-single spaced pages of heated rhetoric"Source
— Judge Nathan
(A description of Maxwell's motion in the Order denying it.)
DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
Quote #1
"no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions"Source
— Judge Nathan
(Describing Maxwell's reasoning for why criminal discovery materials were necessary for her civil cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
Quote #2
"coherent explanation"Source
— Judge Nathan
(Stating what was absent from Maxwell's argument regarding the relevance of criminal discovery materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
Quote #3
"plainly"Source
— Judge Nathan
(Used to emphasize that Maxwell had failed to establish good cause to modify the Protective Order.)
DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
Quote #4
"remain[ed] in the dark as to why this information will be relevant"Source
— Judge Nathan
(Expressing continued uncertainty about the relevance of the information to the civil cases, even while permitting Maxwell to share it under seal.)
DOJ-OGR-00019349.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document