DOJ-OGR-00009377.jpg

409 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 409 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, capturing the testimony of a witness named Brune. During redirect and recross examination, Brune explains that a particular document resembled a credit report and merely confirmed a pre-existing belief, hence they chose not to investigate further despite their past training as an AUSA. The questioning then turns to redacted Social Security numbers on the document and what the witness learned from an unredacted version.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
A witness being questioned during redirect and recross examination.
MS. DAVIS Attorney
An attorney questioning the witness, Brune, and concluding with 'No further questions.'
MR. SCHECTMAN Attorney
An attorney beginning the recross examination of the witness, Brune.
Judge Judge
Addressed by Mr. Schectman before he begins his question.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
AUSA Government agency
Mentioned as part of the witness's past training ('training as an AUSA'). Stands for Assistant United States Attorney.
Grand Jury Legal body
Mentioned in the context of the witness's past experience conducting investigations.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-02-24
Redirect and recross examination of witness Brune regarding their interpretation of a document, their decision not to investigate further, and redacted Social Security numbers on the document.
Southern District

Locations (1)

Location Context
Part of the name of the court reporting agency, implying the location of the legal proceedings.

Relationships (2)

MS. DAVIS Professional Brune
Ms. Davis, an attorney, is conducting a redirect examination of Brune, a witness.
MR. SCHECTMAN Professional Brune
Mr. Schectman, an attorney, is conducting a recross examination of Brune, a witness.

Key Quotes (2)

"What I'm saying is, is this thing to me looks, and I think would have looked had I seen it at the time, as kind of like a credit report, and I think it would have confirmed what I thought I already knew, which is that there were two people who had the same name."
Source
— Brune (The witness's response when asked if certain pieces of information were important to them.)
DOJ-OGR-00009377.jpg
Quote #1
"I would not."
Source
— Brune (The witness's response when asked if they would have chosen to investigate.)
DOJ-OGR-00009377.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document