DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
491 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
491 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' personal practice as a pilot of transcribing passenger names from manifests into a personal logbook. It also explores how Rodgers would record passengers whose names were unknown, using placeholders like "one passenger" or "one PAX," and sometimes noting their gender.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined. Provides the answers ('A.') in the transcript.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that produced the transcript.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination where an unnamed individual is questioning Rodgers in a formal, legal setting.
Key Quotes (4)
"You had a practice, I think you described this, of taking the manifests and then taking the names of the passengers and entering them in your own personal pilot logbook, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question describing the witness's procedure for logging passenger information.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #1
"But that's your particular practice; it's not what every pilot does, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question clarifying that the witness's logging method is a personal habit and not a universal standard for pilots.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #2
"And if you didn't know their names, you might put in something like "one passenger" or "one PAX" to indicate an unnamed passenger?"Source
— Questioner
(A question about how the witness would log passengers whose names were unknown.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #3
"And then later you might have put -- or around the same time you might have put "one female" or "one male" to indicate the gender, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question about the witness's practice of noting the gender of unnamed passengers.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document