DOJ-OGR-00004848.jpg

713 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court opinion page
File Size: 713 KB
Summary

This document page discusses the legal reasoning behind admitting "prior bad act" testimony and deposition evidence regarding Quaaludes to establish a common plan or scheme by Cosby. It highlights similarities between past incidents and the current allegations, such as the victims' age, relationship establishment, and consumption of substances, while citing Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404(b) regarding character evidence.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Cosby
Constand

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Commonwealth
Pa. Super.

Timeline (1 events)

Commonwealth v. Tyson

Relationships (1)

Cosby Accuser in allegations connected to prior acts Constand

Key Quotes (3)

"signature of the same perpetrator."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004848.jpg
Quote #1
"probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004848.jpg
Quote #2
"testimony of the five prior bad act witnesses... was admissible to demonstrate Cosby’s common plan, scheme, or design."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004848.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document