DOJ-OGR-00010057.jpg

451 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 451 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on March 23, 2022, detailing the recross-examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning, led by the Court and involving attorneys Mr. Schectman and Ms. Davis, covers a fraud alert related to two Social Security numbers and the ethical obligations of the witness's firm. A key point of discussion is whether the firm would have voluntarily disclosed information from a July 21 letter about an investigation into Juror No. 7 without being prompted by the Court or the government.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
A witness being questioned during a recross-examination in court.
MR. SCHECTMAN Attorney
An attorney who questions the witness, Brune.
Ms. Davis Attorney
An attorney present at the hearing, addressed by the Court.
Juror No. 7 Juror
The subject of an investigation mentioned in a letter from the witness's firm.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (2 events)

Recross-examination of witness Brune regarding a fraud alert, Social Security numbers, and the disclosure of information about an investigation into Juror No. 7.
Courtroom
An investigation into Juror No. 7 conducted by the witness's (Brune's) firm.
Brune's firm Juror No. 7

Relationships (3)

THE COURT Professional Brune
The Court, acting as the judge, directly questions the witness, Brune, during a legal proceeding.
MR. SCHECTMAN Professional Brune
Mr. Schectman, an attorney, concludes his questioning of the witness, Brune.
Ms. Davis Professional THE COURT
The Court addresses Ms. Davis, an attorney, to ask if she has further questions for the witness.

Key Quotes (2)

"I don't think we would have, your Honor. And as I think about it, we have an ethical obligation to be accurate and honest, and it's something that we take very seriously."
Source
— THE WITNESS (Brune) (Responding to the Court's question about whether their firm would have disclosed information about Juror No. 7 if the Court or government had not raised the issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00010057.jpg
Quote #1
"But I don't think that we're obliged to identify arguments that the government might make in our opening brief."
Source
— THE WITNESS (Brune) (Explaining the firm's position on their legal obligations regarding disclosure and argumentation in legal briefs.)
DOJ-OGR-00010057.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document