DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
727 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
727 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing dated September 22, 2021, that discusses the legal standards for pretrial detention and the reopening of bail hearings. It references the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3142), which allows for reopening a hearing with new, material information, and also cites case law (Raniere, Havens, Rowe, Petrov) to establish that a court has inherent authority to reconsider its own bail decisions even without new evidence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Raniere | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Raniere.
|
| Havens | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Havens.
|
| Rowe | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Rowe.
|
| Petrov | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Petrov.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court | government agency |
Referred to as "The Court" throughout the document, discussing its authority regarding bail hearings.
|
Timeline (4 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Eastern District of New York, mentioned in the citation for United States v. Raniere.
|
|
|
Western District of New York, mentioned in the citation for United States v. Havens.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, mentioned in the citations for United States v. Rowe and United States v. Petrov.
|
Relationships (4)
The document cites the case United States v. Raniere, indicating an adversarial legal relationship between the government and the defendant.
The document cites the case United States v. Havens, indicating an adversarial legal relationship between the government and the defendant.
The document cites the case United States v. Rowe, indicating an adversarial legal relationship between the government and the defendant.
The document cites the case United States v. Petrov, indicating an adversarial legal relationship between the government and the defendant.
Key Quotes (5)
"no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community."Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1)
(The legal standard a court must conclude to hold a defendant without bail.)
DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
Quote #1
"information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing on the issue"Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)
(The condition under the Bail Reform Act for a court to reopen a bail hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
Quote #2
"[a]s the court has already held one detention hearing, it need not hold another"Source
— Court in United States v. Raniere
(A note from a court decision illustrating that a court is not required to reopen a bail hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
Quote #3
"a release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing."Source
— Court in United States v. Rowe
(A note from a court decision establishing the court's inherent authority to revisit its decisions, even outside the specific statutory text of § 3142(f).)
DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
Quote #4
"Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision"Source
— Court in United States v. Petrov
(A note from a court decision affirming the court's power to reconsider its own bail rulings.)
DOJ-OGR-00000867.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document