DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg

646 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / judicial opinion
File Size: 646 KB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a court order (Document 653) filed on April 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's finding that 'Juror 50' did not deliberately provide false testimony on his jury questionnaire but rather rushed through it carelessly. The Court concludes that Juror 50 was not biased, can serve impartially despite being a survivor of sexual abuse, and would not have been struck for cause even if he had disclosed his history accurately.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a court inquiry regarding potential false testimony and nondisclosure on a juror questionnaire.
The Court Judge/Judiciary
Presiding authority evaluating Juror 50's conduct; likely Judge Alison J. Nathan based on case number AJN.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp)
United States District Court
Implied by the case filing format and 'The Court' references.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-04-01
Filing of Court Document 653
Court Record
Unknown (Prior to filing)
Post-trial Hearing regarding Juror 50
Courtroom

Relationships (1)

The Court Judicial Oversight Juror 50
The Court questioned Juror 50 and evaluated his credibility regarding questionnaire answers.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court thus credits his testimony that he was distracted as he filled out the questionnaire and “skimmed way too fast,” leading him to misunderstand some of the questions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50’s lack of attention and care in responding accurately to every question on the questionnaire is regrettable, but the Court is confident that the failure to disclose was not deliberate."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court further finds that Juror 50 was not biased and would not have been stricken for cause even if he had answered each question on the questionnaire accurately."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg
Quote #3
"Thus, this Court would not have struck Juror 50 for cause if he had provided accurate responses to the questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document