EFTA00014131.pdf
57.3 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
57.3 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain dated November 4-5, 2008, among unidentified officials (likely DOJ/US Attorney's Office) discussing how to respond to a letter from attorney Edwards dated October 15, 2008. The participants discuss the risks of providing a written response that could be used in civil suits or the press, with one official proposing a minimal response stating the Office is not party to civil suits but will review evidence of any breach of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards | Attorney |
Author of an Oct 15, 2008 letter regarding Epstein; likely Brad Edwards representing victims.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned as 'Mr. Epstein'; subject of a criminal investigation and Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
| AUSA [Redacted] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Designated recipient for evidence regarding breaches of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Office |
Refers to the US Attorney's Office or DOJ, involved in the criminal investigation of Epstein.
|
Relationships (2)
Mention of 'criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein' and 'Non-Prosecution Agreement'.
Correspondence regarding potential breach of agreement; concern about letters being used in pleadings.
Key Quotes (4)
"I hate the idea of writing yet another letter that will be attached to a pleading or quoted in the paper."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #1
"The Office is involved in the criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein and is neither a party to nor involved in any civil suits against him."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #2
"If you have any documentary evidence that you believe establishes a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, you can forward that evidence to AUSA [Redacted]."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #3
"Please ensure that it is factually correct, particularly with regard to what Epstein agreed to during the negotiations."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document