DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
647 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal opinion
File Size:
647 KB
Summary
This document is page 9 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court rules that while a hearing is warranted regarding Juror 50's potential failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse, the Defendant has not justified an inquiry into Juror 50's social media usage. The Judge notes that Juror 50's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps during jury selection do not implicate the 'McDonough' standard for juror misconduct.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of an inquiry regarding potential misconduct and false answers during jury selection.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Seeking a hearing to probe Juror 50's answers; identified as Ghislaine Maxwell via case number and 'Maxwell Br.' refe...
|
| AJN | Judge |
Presiding Judge (Initials in Case Number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, referring to Alison J. Nathan).
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant seeks a hearing to probe Juror 50's answers.
Key Quotes (3)
"The potential impropriety that warrants a hearing is not that someone with a history of sexual abuse may have served on the jury. Rather, it is Juror 50’s potential failure to respond truthfully to questions during the jury selection process"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
Quote #1
"I do, but I actually just deleted them because I just got out of a relationship and I didn’t want to see anything regarding them. So I am fully off of it right now."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
Quote #2
"The Defendant has not justified an inquiry into Juror 50’s social media"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document