EFTA00016130.pdf
61.6 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
61.6 KB
Summary
This document contains an email chain from July and August 2019 regarding the case 'US v. Gatto'. Jonathan M. Albano of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP asks other counsel if they object to him filing a copy of the Second Circuit's decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell unsealing) with the court. The underlying email from a redacted Assistant US Attorney provides the government's opposition to a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene in the Gatto case.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan M. Albano | Attorney |
Sender of the top email; Partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.
|
| Kathleen A. Slowe | Assistant |
Assistant to Jonathan M. Albano.
|
| Victoria Peng | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Steve Haney | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Michael Schachter | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Mark C. Moore | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Jon | Sender |
Sign-off name for Jonathan M. Albano.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP |
Law firm representing Jonathan M. Albano.
|
|
| Oath Inc. |
Entity filing a motion to intervene in US v. Gatto.
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Southern District of New York (SDNY), sender of the July 22 email.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court |
Issued the decision in Brown v. Maxwell referenced in the email.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.
|
|
|
Address for the United States Attorney's Office SDNY.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for the US Attorney's Office.
|
Relationships (2)
Listed as Assistant in signature block.
Email exchange regarding US v. Gatto.
Key Quotes (2)
"Would you please let me know if you have any objection to my filing with the Court a copy of the attached decision of the Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell (July 3, 2019)?"Source
EFTA00016130.pdf
Quote #1
"Please find attached the Government’s opposition to Oath Inc.’s motion to intervene for the limited purpose of obtaining materials."Source
EFTA00016130.pdf
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document