DOJ-OGR-00001239.jpg
724 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion (defense bail argument)
File Size:
724 KB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on March 23, 2021, arguing for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bail. The defense proposes restraining Maxwell's and her spouse's assets under the supervision of a former federal judge to prevent flight. The text also argues that pending pretrial motions—including challenges based on a non-prosecution agreement, constitutional violations, and time-barred Mann Act charges—significantly weaken the government's case.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail motion; defense argues her assets should be restrained and that her pretrial motions have merit.
|
| Ms. Maxwell's Spouse | Family Member |
Mentioned in context of assets being overseen alongside Maxwell's.
|
| Former federal District Court judge | Proposed Overseer |
Proposed to supervise Ms. Maxwell's assets to prevent violation of release terms.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Entity being petitioned to grant bail.
|
|
| The Government |
Opposing party; defense challenges the strength of their case.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer Bates stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-03-23
Filing of legal document arguing for bail and asserting that pretrial motions could result in dismissal of charges.
Federal District Court
Relationships (1)
Document mentions oversight of 'assets of Ms. Maxwell and her spouse'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Restraining Ms. Maxwell’s assets that are not used to secure the bond and placing them under the supervision of a former federal District Court judge eliminates any concern that such funds could be used to violate the terms of release."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001239.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell’s pretrial motions raise serious legal issues that could result in dismissal of charges, if not the entire indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001239.jpg
Quote #2
"Among the dozen submissions are motions to dismiss the superseding indictment for breach of the non-prosecution agreement..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001239.jpg
Quote #3
"Other motions seek dismissal of the Mann Act charges as being time-barred and the perjury charges as based on non-perjurious statements."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001239.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document