EFTA00029176.pdf
30.6 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
30.6 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from May 4, 2020, involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the review and editing of a memo, with discussions about softening comments, timing the release of the edits to 'the team,' and scheduling a teleconference. There is a specific strategic discussion about whether to cut a section related to a redacted individual, citing morale and 'getting up to speed' as factors.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Sender/Recipient |
Employee at USANYS or associated legal team discussing a memo.
|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Recipient |
Identified as (USANYS) in the email header.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (recipient organization)
|
Relationships (1)
Sender
→
Colleagues/Legal Team
→
Recipient (USANYS)
Discussing internal memo drafts and strategy.
Key Quotes (4)
"I've gone back through the memo and softened/modified a number of my comments."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #1
"Since we're not telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section (yet), I would be inclined to send this back now..."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #2
"I also think it would be helpful both to morale and to getting [REDACTED] up to speed to have [REDACTED] review the memo as drafted before telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #3
"We are about to flip our edits to their memo back to them, and I want to be sure we have the teleconference with you before this memo is finalized."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document