DOJ-OGR-00001375.jpg

648 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (reply brief - appeal)
File Size: 648 KB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a legal reply brief filed on April 19, 2021, in Case 21-770 (associated with Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense argues that the lower court did not conduct a 'lengthy bail hearing' and that the Government presented no actual evidence, relying solely on the text of the Indictment to argue the strength of the case and flight risk. The filing contends the court erred by accepting the Indictment itself as proof of the strength of evidence.

People (2)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Accused
Subject of the bail hearing; described by government as having 'incredibly strong incentive to flee'
The Government Prosecution
Argued against bail; cited the Indictment rather than presenting new evidence

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court
Conducted the arraignment and bail hearing; allegedly erred in agreeing the Indictment demonstrated strength of evidence
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Prior to 04/19/2021)
Video arraignment and bail hearing
Court (Video)

Relationships (1)

The Government Adversarial / Legal The Defendant
Government arguing for detention based on flight risk; Defendant appealing.

Key Quotes (4)

"that the presumption of innocence is more than mere words on a page."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001375.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government did not present any actual evidence at this brief hearing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001375.jpg
Quote #2
"The court erred in agreeing that the Indictment itself demonstrates strength."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001375.jpg
Quote #3
"At no point did the Government introduce or even proffer any actual evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001375.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document