DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg

985 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 985 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. A witness, Ms. Conrad, is being questioned about providing conflicting residency information (Bronx vs. Bronxville) during jury selection. The questioning suggests she may have misrepresented her address to appear more 'marketable' as a juror and to potentially conceal a tumultuous home life.

People (6)

Name Role Context
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS Named party in case
Mentioned in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
Conrad Witness
The person being questioned under direct examination throughout the transcript.
Judge Pauley Judge
Mentioned as the judge to whom the witness (Conrad) swore on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
MR. OKULA Attorney
Makes objections on behalf of the witness or a related party during the questioning.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge who rules on objections, referred to as 'THE COURT' and addressed as 'your Honor'.
Ms. Conrad Witness
A formal address for the witness, Conrad, used by the questioner.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA government agency
The plaintiff in the case, as shown in the case title.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS company
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings, mentioned at the bottom of the document.

Timeline (4 events)

2009-03-24
Witness Conrad was sworn to give a deposition under oath.
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
Courtroom
Conrad MR. OKULA THE COURT Unnamed Questioner
Witness Conrad swore to bar authorities on February 26th that she lived in the Bronx.
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Courtroom

Locations (3)

Location Context
A location where the witness, Conrad, claimed to have a residence, described as a more affluent community.
A location where the witness, Conrad, has a residence, specifically on Barker Avenue.
The specific street in the Bronx where the witness, Conrad, has lived for many years.

Relationships (2)

Conrad personal her husband
The questioner alleges that Conrad and her husband are 'constantly, every day and night, engaged in screaming and fights and insults and threats'.
MR. OKULA professional Conrad
Mr. Okula acts as an attorney, making objections during the questioning of Conrad, suggesting he represents her or a party aligned with her interests.

Key Quotes (5)

"Probably so I would be more marketable as a juror."
Source
— Conrad (Answering why she didn't tell the Court she lived in both the Bronx and Bronxville.)
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
Quote #1
"Because you knew that you could be an unbiased juror, you decided to lie to get on a jury, is that right?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (Accusing the witness of intentionally lying about her residence to be selected for the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
Quote #2
"I consider myself having two residences."
Source
— Conrad (Her explanation for providing different addresses at different times.)
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
Quote #3
"Because you and your husband are constantly, every day and night, engaged in screaming and fights and insults and threats, right?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (Questioning the witness about her home life, implying a motive to conceal her living situation.)
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
Quote #4
"MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor. Relevance."
Source
— MR. OKULA (Objecting to the line of questioning about the witness's domestic situation.)
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document