DOJ-OGR-00018407.jpg
332 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
332 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion before the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Counsel, Ms. Sternheim, requests a sidebar with the Judge to address matters concerning the witness's anonymity status. The Court agrees, and the subsequent pages of the transcript are sealed.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, speaking with counsel.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel |
Addressing the court regarding a witness's testimony.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A court proceeding involving the direct examination of a witness named Kate.
courtroom
2022-08-10
Ms. Sternheim requested a sidebar due to the witness's anonymity status, which the Court granted. The content of this conference, pages 1211 to 1231, was sealed.
sidebar
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Proposed by Ms. Sternheim as the location for a discussion due to a witness's anonymity.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the alternative to a sidebar for the discussion.
|
Relationships (1)
The document shows a formal interaction between a judge (THE COURT) and a lawyer (Counsel, MS. STERNHEIM) during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (1)
"Judge, in light of this witness's anonymity status, I think it's appropriate to do it at a sidebar."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Explaining to the Court why a private discussion (sidebar) is necessary before proceeding in open court.)
DOJ-OGR-00018407.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document