DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
44.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court filing
File Size:
44.5 KB
Summary
This document discusses legal arguments made by Maxwell to dismiss an indictment, focusing on the unavailability of witnesses and the impact of pretrial publicity. It references the Palm Beach investigation into Epstein and questions the credibility of potential testimony from Epstein himself, while noting that Maxwell's reputation has shifted from Epstein's friend to a co-conspirator.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant / Subject of legal discussion |
Maxwell believes one individual worked with alleged victims; Maxwell contends potential witnesses would have provided...
|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation / Co-conspirator |
Police detective investigated Epstein in Florida; testimony from Epstein credible; Maxwell's friend, now co-conspirator.
|
| his mother | Unspecified individual related to Maxwell |
One individual Maxwell believes worked with alleged victims, along with his mother.
|
| a police detective | Investigator |
Investigated Epstein in Florida; testimony suggested by Maxwell.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR |
Document origin/tracking
|
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Epstein investigation location
|
|
|
Palm Beach investigation
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, referenced in legal citation
|
|
|
7th Circuit Court, referenced in legal citation
|
|
|
2nd Circuit Court, referenced in legal citation
|
Relationships (3)
Maxwell's reputation transformed from that of Epstein's friend to a co-conspirator.
one individual Maxwell believes worked with one of the alleged victims... and his mother
a police detective who investigated Epstein in Florida
Key Quotes (5)
"Courts have generally found that vague assertions that a deceased witness might have provided favorable testimony do not justify dismissing an indictment for delay."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
Quote #1
"The testimony she suggests the detective might have offered—that witnesses in the Palm Beach investigation did not identify Maxwell by name—is propensity evidence that does nothing to establish her innocence of the charged offenses."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
Quote #2
"There are also serious doubts under all of the relevant circumstances that a jury would have found testimony from Epstein credible even if he had waived his right against self-incrimination and testified on her behalf."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
Quote #3
"Maxwell's arguments that the indictment should be dismissed because of the possibility of missing witnesses, failing memories, or lost records fail for similar reasons."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
Quote #4
"Maxwell contends that lengthy public interest in this case has transformed her reputation from that of Epstein's friend to a co-conspirator."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000135.tif
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document