DOJ-OGR-00009927.jpg
1010 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
6
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
1010 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Conrad, a former juror in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, her memory of prior court proceedings, and her past confrontational statements to the court, such as calling her husband a "convicted felon" whom she might retain as a lawyer and telling the court that her finances were "none of your business." Ms. Conrad's testimony is evasive and hostile, suggesting a contentious relationship with the court and the defendant's counsel.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Mentioned in the case title, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. The witness, Ms. Conrad, refers to...
|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness / Juror |
The individual being questioned in the transcript. She was one of the jurors who rendered a verdict against Paul M. D...
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who instructed Ms. Conrad to take an oath, advised her to get a lawyer, and explained the purp...
|
| Ms. Sternheim |
Mentioned in the context of a financial affidavit Ms. Conrad filled out, which was to determine if Ms. Conrad had the...
|
|
| Ms. Conrad's husband | Spouse of witness |
Referred to by Ms. Conrad as "my husband, the convicted felon." She is questioned about a statement where she said sh...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government agency |
The plaintiff in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas.
|
| The Court / federal court | Government agency |
The judicial body hearing the case, which Ms. Conrad provided testimony to and which was to determine her financial n...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | Company |
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings, mentioned in the footer.
|
Timeline (6 events)
2011-03-01
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
Federal Court
2011-03-02
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
Federal Court
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad.
Federal Court, Southern District
Ms. Conrad
Unidentified attorney
Unknown (December 20th of a prior year)
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
Federal Court
Ms. Conrad
The Court
Unknown (prior to 2012-02-15)
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
Federal Court
Unknown (start of the Daugerdas case)
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Federal Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporters, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS", indicating the jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Conrad states she was one of the "jurors rendered against your client," referring to Daugerdas. Her testimony shows clear animosity towards him.
She refers to him as "my husband" and confirms he is a "convicted felon."
The transcript details interactions where Judge Pauley gave instructions to Ms. Conrad regarding taking an oath, retaining a lawyer, and the purpose of voir dire.
Key Quotes (3)
"Sure, ripping off the government."Source
— Ms. Conrad
(Her response when asked if she considered Mr. Daugerdas to be a financially successful lawyer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009927.jpg
Quote #1
"I'll retain myself or my husband, the convicted felon,"Source
— Ms. Conrad
(A statement she allegedly made to Judge Pauley after being advised to get a lawyer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009927.jpg
Quote #2
"none of your business."Source
— Ms. Conrad
(Her response to the Court on December 20th when asked if she owned any stocks or bonds.)
DOJ-OGR-00009927.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document