DOJ-OGR-00017791.jpg

533 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 533 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Jane's exact age (13 vs 14) when she first met Jeffrey Epstein, referencing prior statements made to the government and court filings.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
Being cross-examined regarding her age when she met Epstein.
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Questioning the witness (Jane).
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Mentioned as the person the witness met when she was 13 or 14.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, asks for clarification on document location.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Referenced as having interviewed the witness previously.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (implied by Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court Filing Date
Southern District (NY)
Unknown (Summer)
Jane meeting Jeffrey Epstein
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Jane Victim/Perpetrator (implied) Jeffrey Epstein
Witness testifying about the age she was when she met Epstein.
Ms. Menninger Attorney/Witness Jane
Ms. Menninger is conducting the cross-examination of Jane.

Key Quotes (3)

"No, I always from the beginning said 13, but I turned 14 that summer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017791.jpg
Quote #1
"So you were not asked if it was possible that you met Epstein after you turned 14?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017791.jpg
Quote #2
"The second half of that makes sense, which is I was probably 13. And it says here that I turned 14 that summer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017791.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document