DOJ-OGR-00015119.jpg
1.14 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
8
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.14 MB
Summary
This legal document argues against the unsealing of grand jury materials related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing, made on behalf of unnamed third parties, contends that their privacy interests and the potential for irreparable harm outweigh any public interest in disclosure, citing legal precedent for grand jury secrecy. It also references a similar, recent decision in the Southern District of Florida regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation to support its position that the materials should remain sealed.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Subject of indictment |
Mentioned in the context that the events detailed in her indictment occurred between 1994 and 1997.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned in a footnote regarding the government's investigation into him and a related decision by the Southern Dist...
|
Organizations (8)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| BINDER & SCHWARTZ | Law firm |
Appears as a logo at the top of the document, likely representing a party in the case.
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Mentioned as the Department of Justice, which counsel for the redacted parties asked for context regarding the grand ...
|
| The government | Government |
Referred to as a party in the case that has not met its burden to justify unsealing materials, and as the entity that...
|
| Southern District of Florida | Judiciary |
Mentioned in a footnote as a court that recently declined to unseal grand jury materials related to the Jeffrey Epste...
|
| Second Circuit | Judiciary |
Cited as a court that has recognized limited exceptions to grand jury secrecy.
|
| Newsday, Inc. | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'In re Application of Newsday, Inc.'.
|
| N.Y. Times Co. | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'In re N.Y. Times Co.'.
|
| Procter & Gamble | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Procter & Gamble, 356 U.S. at 681 n.6'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
1994-1997
Events detailed in the indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell occurred during this period.
2025-07-23
The Southern District of Florida denied a petition to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a footnote as the location of a court that recently ruled on a similar matter.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"privacy interests of innocent third parties as well as those of defendants . . . should weigh heavily in a court’s balancing equation"Source
— In re N.Y. Times Co.
(Quoted to support the argument that privacy interests should prevent the unsealing of grand jury materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00015119.jpg
Quote #1
"brings about the death"Source
— Craig, 131 F.3d at 107
(Cited in the context that the passage of time may favor disclosure of grand jury materials because it 'inevitably “brings about the death” of all parties involved'.)
DOJ-OGR-00015119.jpg
Quote #2
"to protect [the] innocent accused . . . ."Source
— Procter & Gamble, 356 U.S. at 681 n.6
(Quoted to explain one of the purposes of grand jury secrecy.)
DOJ-OGR-00015119.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document