DOJ-OGR-00013286.jpg
603 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
603 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about jury instructions concerning an alleged victim named Kate. The judge clarifies their view on the instruction, avoiding complexities of New Mexico law. An attorney for the government, Ms. Sternheim, then informs the court that their next witness will be Janine Gill, an employee of the Trump organization since 2007, and that they will introduce two government exhibits.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in a quoted instruction regarding his character or propensity to commit crimes.
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in a quoted instruction regarding her character or propensity to commit crimes.
|
|
| Kate | Alleged victim |
Mentioned as an alleged victim in the indictment, for whom a specific jury instruction is being discussed.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
A participant in the court proceedings, addressed by the Court and responding.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
A participant in the court proceedings, speaking to the Court.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
A participant in the court proceedings, representing the government and announcing the next witness.
|
| Janine Gill | Witness |
Identified as the government's expected next witness, an employee of the Trump organization.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Trump organization | company |
Mentioned as the employer of the next witness, Janine Gill.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2007
Janine Gill became an employee of a property company related to the Trump organization.
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding jury instructions for a case involving an alleged victim named Kate, and the announcement of the next government witness.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to its laws on sexual activity, which the court finds unnecessary to delve into.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states, "My understanding is she is employed by some property company, either under the auspices or related to the Trump organization. She became an employee in 2007."
Ms. Sternheim speaks on behalf of the government, stating their plans to call a witness and introduce exhibits.
Key Quotes (3)
"consider this testimony as any kind of reflection on Mr. Epstein's nor Ms. Maxwell's character or propensity to commit any of the crimes charged in the indictment."Source
— Unknown (quoted by the Court)
(A portion of a jury instruction being discussed by the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00013286.jpg
Quote #1
"So that's my view. You can react to it now or think about it."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge stating their opinion on the jury instruction and giving the attorneys time to respond.)
DOJ-OGR-00013286.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, the government, I expect, will be calling, perhaps as its next witness, an individual named Janine Gill."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Informing the court about the government's plan for its next witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013286.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document