EFTA00016159.pdf

58.2 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain / internal doj correspondence
File Size: 58.2 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from June 2020 between attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the legal procedural requirements (specifically '6(e) orders' related to grand jury secrecy) needed to allow the Civil division to review specific 'trust agreements' related to the Epstein case. The discussion highlights concerns about privacy, protective orders, and whether to notify the individuals who provided the trust agreements.

People (4)

Name Role Context
John McEnany USANYS Attorney
Sender of an email discussing the need for a new court order regarding disclosure and privacy concerns.
L. Fogelman USANYS / DOJ
Cc'd on the email chain (email address LFogelman@usa.doj.gov visible).
Ted Unknown (likely colleague)
Referenced in the text 'order attached to Ted's email'.
Redacted Sender (Page 2) Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit
Author of the earliest email in the visible thread, from the SDNY Public Corruption Unit.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-02-03
Date referenced in the attachment filename regarding a signed 6e disclosure order.
Court
2020-06-29
Internal discussion regarding legal procedure for disclosing trust agreements to the Civil division.
SDNY
John McEnany USANYS Staff

Locations (2)

Relationships (1)

John McEnany Colleagues L. Fogelman
Included on the same internal USANYS email chain.

Key Quotes (3)

"Do you have a copy of the second 6(e) order from February that allowed Civil to review the additional trust agreements beyond those referenced in the order attached to Ted's email?"
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #1
"We need to apply for a new order with an application that would discuss why we need to disclose; privacy concerns; potential protective orders; should we give notice to the people we got the trust agreements from (and if not why not), etc."
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #2
"This is the original order, which does seem to suggest we need 'further order of the court' to further disclose."
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document