DOJ-OGR-00010123.jpg
537 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal opinion / case law (westlaw printout)
File Size:
537 KB
Summary
This document is a Westlaw printout of a 2010 New York Supreme Court Appellate Division decision (Matter of Catherine M. Conrad). It details the disciplinary proceedings against attorney Catherine M. Conrad, ruling that her immediate reinstatement to the bar was not warranted due to alcohol dependence and a failure to cooperate with previous investigations. The document appears to be an exhibit (A-5840) filed in a later case (Case 1:20-cv-00888), likely as legal precedent or evidence regarding attorney conduct.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. Conrad | Respondent / Suspended Attorney |
Subject of disciplinary proceedings regarding alcohol dependence and failure to cooperate with investigations.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York |
The judicial body issuing the decision.
|
|
| Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department |
The body instituting disciplinary proceedings against Conrad.
|
|
| Thomson Reuters / Westlaw |
Source of the legal document printout.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2010-12-09
Court decision regarding the suspension and reinstatement of Catherine M. Conrad.
New York
Catherine M. Conrad
Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Prior to 2010-12-09
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court case.
|
Relationships (1)
Petitioner vs Respondent in disciplinary hearing.
Key Quotes (2)
"Immediate reinstatement of suspended attorney to practice of law was not warranted; alcohol dependence rendered attorney unfit to practice law"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010123.jpg
Quote #1
"attorney acknowledged during her deposition that her failure to cooperate and her underlying conduct was related to alcohol dependency."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010123.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document