DOJ-OGR-00016601.jpg
618 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
618 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses her extensive experience testifying on the psychology of memory, clarifying that her expertise does not extend to neuroscience and the biological functions of the brain, for which she would defer to another expert.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being questioned ('Loftus - direct'). She is the one answering the questions (A...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal question-and-answer session (direct examination) in a legal proceeding, with one party questioning the other as an expert witness.
Key Quotes (3)
"The vast majority of those 300 cases are testimony about memory."Source
— Loftus
(Answering a question about her experience being declared an expert in the science of memory.)
DOJ-OGR-00016601.jpg
Quote #1
"I talk about memory and the processes of memory. It's the neuroscientist who might be the ones who want to tell you about the hippocampus and the amygdala and how it connects to the parts of the brain."Source
— Loftus
(Distinguishing her expertise in the psychology of memory from the biological focus of neuroscience.)
DOJ-OGR-00016601.jpg
Quote #2
"I would defer to a different expert, if you're talking about matters of neuroscience."Source
— Loftus
(Clarifying the limits of her expertise when asked about the impact of memory on the brain.)
DOJ-OGR-00016601.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document