DOJ-OGR-00001225.jpg

497 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 497 KB
Summary

This legal document outlines a court's reasoning for continuing the pretrial detention of a defendant. The Court finds that the defendant has demonstrated a significant 'lack of candor' regarding her finances, particularly in representations made to Pretrial Services, and therefore poses a flight risk. A proposed $28.5 million bail package is deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at future proceedings.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Defendant Defendant
The subject of the court document, whose pretrial detention is being discussed.
Defendant's spouse Spouse of Defendant
Mentioned as a potential co-signer on a proposed $22.5 million personal recognizance bond.
English
Cited in a legal case, `English, 629 F.3d at 319`, to establish a legal standard.
Mercedes
Cited in a legal case, `Mercedes, 254 F.3d at 436`, which was quoted in the English case.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Pretrial Services government agency
The entity to which the Defendant made 'woefully incomplete' representations about her finances.
the Court judicial body
The decision-making body that concludes the Defendant should remain in pretrial detention.
the Government government agency
The party arguing for the Defendant's detention, which the Court found has met its burden of persuasion.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-07
The Defendant made representations to Pretrial Services that were later found to be incomplete.
2020-12-30
The Court ruled that the Defendant's pretrial detention continues to be warranted due to a lack of candor and being a flight risk.

Relationships (1)

Defendant personal (marital) Defendant's spouse
The document states the Defendant has a spouse who would co-sign a proposed $22.5 million personal recognizance bond.

Key Quotes (1)

"a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight."
Source
— English, 629 F.3d at 319 (quoting Mercedes, 254 F.3d at 436) (The legal standard cited by the Court that the Government has met to justify the Defendant's detention.)
DOJ-OGR-00001225.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document